Legal Opinion
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. International Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 27, 2017No. 2016-2563; 2016-2539PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REYNA, Circuit Judge.
The International Trade Commission entered a limited exclusion order against Ar-ista Networks, Inc. based on its final determination that Arista infringed three of Cisco Systems, Inc.’s patents. The Commission also determined that Arista did not infringe two other Cisco patents. The exclusion order excluded entry into the United States imports of certain network devices, related software, and components thereof. Arista appeals the Commission’s infringement determination and the scope of the limited exclusion order. Cisco cross-appeals the Commission’s noninfringement…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Poly-America, L.P. v. Api Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Ruckus Wireless, Inc. v. Innovative Wireless Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Spansion, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Converse, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Converse, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Techtronic Industries Co. Ltd. v. ItcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Arista Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.