Legal Opinion
02 Micro International Ltd. v. Monolithic Power System, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 10, 2005No. C 00-4071 CW(EDL), C 01-3995 CWPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING 02 MICRO’S MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MPS’ RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW ON CERTAIN ISSUES; AND ADDRESSING OTHER ISSUES; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AFTER BENCH TRIAL
WILKEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 02 Micro International Limited and Counterdefendant 02 Micro, Inc. (collectively, 02 Micro) move for a permanent injunction and seek a finding of inequitable conduct and a finding that the ease is exceptional under Title 35 U.S.C. section 285. 02 Micro further seeks, under the California…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- James E. Peterson v. Harold Kennedy, Richard A. Berthelsen, and National Football League Players AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Oakwood Laboratories LLC v. Bagavathikanun ThanooCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Big Vision Private Ltd. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Mattel, Inc. v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Ajaxo Inc. v. E Trade Financial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- SkinMedica, Inc. v. Histogen Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2012
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.