Legal Opinion

Burien Bark Supply v. King County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1986No. 52558-7PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

King County officials ordered Burien Bark Supply to cease use of a bark sorter on a site zoned for general commercial use. The trial court reversed the order. We affirm the trial court and hold that the zoning ordinance the County sought to enforce is unconstitutionally vague in its application to Burien Bark Supply.

Burien Bark Supply sells beauty bark both retail and wholesale. The business is located on First Avenue South, a 4-lane major arterial in King County. The business site abuts residential property that contains single-family homes, but the site itself is zoned "C-G" (general…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, & Pacific Railroad v. Washington State Human Rights CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Myrick v. Board of Pierce County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Grant County v. BohneWashington Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. CoriaWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 2001

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API