Legal Opinion
United States v. Young
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided April 22, 2005No. 3:98-00038PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
JOHN T. NIXON, Senior District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Bifurcated Juries (Doc. No. 1783), filed with an accompanying memorandum (Doc. No. 1784), to which the government has responded (Doc.. Nos.1819, 1837, 1846). A hearing was held on this motion on January 18, 2005. For the reasons herein, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED.
Background
This case involves an array of alleged criminal activity in which charges have been filed against over twenty-five defendants. The most recent indictment filed by the government, the Fifth Superseding Indictment (“the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Donnell YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008