Legal Opinion

United States v. Donnell Young

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 29, 2005No. 05-5846PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RALPH B. GUY, JR., Circuit Judge.

The government appeals from the order granting defendant Donnell Young’s motion to empanel separate juries to hear the guilt and penalty phases of his trial on capital and noncapital offenses. The district court found it had authority under 18 U.S.C. § 3593(b)(2)(C), on a showing of “good cause,” to decide to empanel a non-death-qualified jury to determine the question of guilt and then, if convicted of a capital offense, to empanel a second death-qualified jury to decide whether to impose the death penalty.

The government maintains that this dual-jury…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. GoffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Gomez-GomezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Stitt v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API