Legal Opinion
United States v. Young
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 18, 2008No. 06-5664PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCook, J., joined by Mills, D.J.,
COLE, J. (pp. 466-72), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
COOK, Circuit Judge.
After voir dire began in Donnell Young’s capital murder case, the government located nineteen new witnesses and sought to add those names to the list of more than 100 already provided to the defense. One of the nineteen, a new eyewitness who saw Young leaving the murder scene, came to light through trial preparation interviews of crime-scene bystanders. Another trial preparation interview turned up information about a related violent assault .Young committed. Through pursuit of that lead, the government…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Seth WindhamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. FergusonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
- United States v. Stephen PritchardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Stephen PritchardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.