Legal Opinion

Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Laureene Pendleton, Administratrix of the Estate of Yvonne Martin, Deceased

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 10, 1988No. 88-1125PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

COWEN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises from an order of the district court reforming the automobile insurance policy issued by the plaintiff so as to increase the defendant’s uninsured motorist coverage to $50,000 for each person and $100,000 per occurrence. Upon review, we conclude that the district court erred in its construction of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Act and will reverse.

I

Plaintiff, Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Prudential”) appeals to this Court from an order denying its motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e)…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  5. Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Botsko v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Groff v. Continental InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. United States v. George Atiyeh United States of America v. George AtiyehCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  4. Byers v. Amerisure InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Oehlmann v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API