Legal Opinion

Botsko v. Donegal Mutual Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 16, 1993No. 1343PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered by the trial court in an action for declaratory judgment to interpret coverage provided by a policy of automobile insurance. We are asked to determine whether the trial court correctly held summarily and as a matter of law that Donegal Mutual Insurance Co. had improperly issued a policy having limited underinsured motorist coverage to Kenneth Botsko without his waiver of the requirement of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law that the policy contain uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage in the amount…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Johnson v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Nationwide Insurance Company v. Marian Resseguie Larry C. Resseguie, Personal Representative of the Estate of Richard Resseguie, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. Lambert v. McClureSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Boyce v. St. Paul Property & Liability InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. BuffettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Lewis v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Salazar v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Allwein v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Motorists Insurance Companies v. EmigSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API