Legal Opinion
Groff v. Continental Insurance
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 29, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-3250PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HUYETT, District Judge.
Once again, this court is asked to resolve a dispute between insured and insurer concerning Pennsylvania law governing uninsured motorist coverage. 1 In this civil action, plaintiff Bette L. Groff (“Bette Groff”), administratrix of the estate of Thomas Eric Zimmerman (“Eric”), deceased, and in her own right, seeks a declaration that defendant The Continental Insurance Company (“Continental”) is obligated to pay as much as $28,000,000 in uninsured motorist coverage to Groff. Groff's complaint can be reduced to two issues: (1) whether Continental’s…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. BuffettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Botsko v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Tukovits v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Electric Insurance Company v. Nathan Rubin Patricia Rubin. Patricia Rubin v. Nathan Rubin Electric Insurance Company, Patricia Rubin and Nathan RubinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Byers v. Amerisure InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.