Legal Opinion

Oehlmann v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 2007No. 3:06-CV-01075PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum

EDWIN M. KOSIK, District Judge.

This case concerns a dispute over Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company’s (“Defendant” or “MetLife”) handling of a life-insurance policy claim, to which Plaintiff JoAnne Oehlmann (“Plaintiff’ or “Oehlmann”) is a primary beneficiary. Oehlmann’s ex-husband purchased the policy for their minor daughter, who tragically died in a house fire on April 26, 2005. Plaintiff pleaded the following causes of action: (1) bad faith; (2) breach of contract; (3) breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (4) breach of fiduciary duty; (5) negligence;…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ridolfi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Johnson v. State Farm Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Upper Pottsgrove Township v. International Fidelity InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Stanford v. National Grange InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. CLAPS v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIESDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API