Legal Opinion

Carter Farms Company v. Hoffman-Laroche, Inc.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 1971No. 718PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Chief Judge.

In this products liability case, we are not concerned with plaintiffs’ theories of liability. The issue is whether there was sufficient evidence that the product was defective and that the product was the proximate cause of plaintiffs’ damages. The trial court ruled the evidence was insufficient for submission of the case to the jury and directed a verdict for defendant at the close of plaintiffs’ case. Plaintiffs appeal.

The product is “Inj acom ADE,” a solution for the prevention and correction of certain vitamin deficiencies in cattle, sheep and swine. It is sold to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stambaugh v. HayesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Brown v. Globe Laboratories, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Hoover and Son v. OM Franklin Serum CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Reid v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Teal v. Potash Company of AmericaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Archuleta v. PinaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Richards v. Upjohn Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Andrus v. Gas Co. of New MexicoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Colorado Serum Company v. ArpWyoming Supreme Court · 1972
  5. In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API