Legal Opinion

Archuleta v. Pina

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1974No. 9683PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OMAN, Justice.

Plaintiffs brought a suit in ejectment for the purposes of gaining possession of certain real estate, hereinafter referred to as Tract 14, and recovering claimed damages. Defendant denied the essential allegations of the complaint, asserted several affirmative defenses and counterclaimed. The case was tried to a jury, but, at the close of all the evidence, the trial court directed a verdict for the plaintiffs upon both the complaint and counterclaim. A judgment was entered pursuant to this verdict whereby it was ordered that plaintiffs recover possession of Tract 14 and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Loucks v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Illinois Steel Co. v. BudziszWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Potash Co. of America v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. Merrill v. StringerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Marquez v. PadillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Melnick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  2. California First Bank v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State Farm General Insurance Company v. CliftonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Skyhook Corp. v. JasperNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Hood v. FulkersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API