Legal Opinion

Morgan Stanley & Co. v. Texas Oil Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1998No. 95-0085PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHecht, Justice

joined by PHILLIPS, Chief Justice GONZALEZ, CORNYN, SPECTOR, OWEN, BAKER and ABBOTT, Justices.

In Holloway v. Skinner, 898 S.W.2d 793, 798 (Tex.1995), we held that for an agent to be liable for tortious interference with its principal’s contract, one prerequisite is that a “plaintiff must prove that the [agent] acted willfully or intentionally to serve the [agent’s] personal interests at the expense of the [principal’s].” In the case now before us we apply the same rule in a similar context— tortious interference with a prospective contractual relationship. Here, as in Holloway, we conclude…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holloway v. SkinnerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Texas Oil Co. v. Tenneco Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Financial Review Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. SturgesTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Fort Worth Independent School District v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Tony Mumfrey v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  5. Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation v. Henry Andrew Hansen, II, M.D.Texas Supreme Court · 2017

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API