Legal Opinion

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. McMahon

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 2007No. 2006-2260PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This court admitted respondent, Carl G. McMahon of Bay Village, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0001304, to the practice of law in Ohio in 1975.

{¶ 2} The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we now suspend respondent’s license to practice for six months and conditionally stay the suspension based on findings that he fabricated information in correspondence to an insurance company while representing a client in a personal-injury claim. Respondent objects to the recommended sanction, argu*332ing that a public reprimand is appropriate based on mitigating factors…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. AgopianOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. GlatkiOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. GlatkiOhio Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. FarrellOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Toledo Bar Assn. v. ScottOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. McMahonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. BrocklerOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. BrocklerOhio Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API