Legal Opinion
Brandtjen & Kluge v. Fincher
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 2, 1941PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
44 Cal.App.2d Supp. 939 (1941)
BRANDTJEN & KLUGE, INC. (a Corporation), Appellant,
v.
C. F. FINCHER, Respondent.
California Court of Appeals.
April 2, 1941.
Catlin & Catlin for Appellant.
Nixon A. Lange and Arch G. McLay for Respondents.
SHAW, P. J.
In each of these cases the plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered against it after a demurrer to its amended complaint had been sustained without leave to amend. The complaints are identical except for names of defendants, dates and amounts of interest and penalties, and statements of facts hereinafter made must be understood as applying to both cases.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Western Lithograph Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Yule v. BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Douglas Aircraft Co., Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Union Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Bank of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Pennwalt Corp. v. Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1973
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Scol Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.