Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Smilansky

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1929No. Docket No. 134, Calendar No. 33,988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, C. J.

This is an action in assumpsit by the plaintiff as the holder of a promissory note of which the defendant Smilansky is the maker. John J. Davis & Sons Company, payee named in the note, became an indorser thereon, as did also the defendant Charles H. Shell. On November 12, 1927, plaintiff took judgment by default for $5,150 against the two indorsers. On March 16,1928, at the conclusion of a jury trial, the court directed a verdict for $5,254.16 against Smilansky. He reviews by writ of error.

Under the defendant’s plea of general issue filed November 9,1927, notice of lack of consideration was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Polhemus v. Ann Arbor Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Ensign v. FoggMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Baker v. Michigan Mutual Protective Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. RiddellMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Detroit Trust Co. v. LangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Kunsky-Trendle Broadcasting Corp. v. Kent Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. McLachlen National Bank v. FieldsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API