Legal Opinion

Standard Oil Co. v. Riddell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1934No. Docket No. 43, Calendar No. 37,171PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

Plaintiff sued Riddell as maker and Colby as indorser of a promissory note and attached a copy of the note to its declaration. It had judgment against Riddell on default and against Colby on trial. Colby reviews.

In his answer Colby denied execution of the note and further claimed that if his signature is genuine it was procured by fraud and deceit. He failed to file and serve an affidavit denying execution of the note as required by Court Rule No. 29 (1931), thereby admitting the genuineness of the signature. Lambert v. Smilansky, 246 Mich. 125.

On its main case plaintiff showed the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lambert v. SmilanskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hardaway v. Consolidated Paper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Pogletke v. SchwanzMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Hardaway v. Consolidated Paper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API