Legal Opinion

McLachlen National Bank v. Fields

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1976No. 9999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant McLachlen National Bank instituted this suit to recover on a promissory note indorsed by appellees Louis I. S. Fields and Constance B. Fields. The trial court dismissed the complaint after determining that the action was barred by a prior judgment obtained against the maker of the note. We conclude that dismissal was improper.

The facts pertinent to this appeal are the following. In 1970 McLachlen National Bank loaned a sum of money to H.V.H., Inc., a restaurant business. In return, the corporation, by its president Louis Fields, executed a promissory note in the amount of $4,452.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Staples v. HendrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  2. Williams v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Petri v. MannyWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Hansen v. BowersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  5. First Discount Corp. v. Hatcher Auto Sales, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Farner v. ColeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API