United States v. Tanya Mann
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-appellant Tanya Mann (“Mann”) was found guilty of aiding and abetting another to knowingly, with intent to defraud, have possession of “device-making equipment” in a manner affecting interstate commerce. See 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(4) (Supp. Ill 1985) (underlying crime) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1982) (aiding and abetting). On appeal Mann contends that the district court erred by (1) failing to instruct the jury that to convict her of aiding and abetting, it must first find that a principal committed the underlying crime; and (2) instructing the jury that only a potential…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Anthony ProvenzanoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- United States v. William A. Raper, United States of America v. Eli B. Childs, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Hilda Escobar De BrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. James M. McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Ricardo GarzaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Amelia Barajas-MontielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- McKenzy Alfred v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- United States v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Juan Ramon Matta-BallesterosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.