Legal Opinion

United States v. Hilda Escobar De Bright

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 18, 1984No. 81-1648PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

After abolishing the long standing concurrent sentence doctrine, an en banc panel, 730 F.2d 1255, remanded this case to the original panel to decide the merits of the defendant’s challenge to her conspiracy conviction. 1 We now hold that the district court committed reversible error in failing to instruct the jury that if it found that the defendant “conspired” only with a government agent she could not be found guilty of conspiracy. Accordingly, we reverse her conspiracy conviction.

Hilda Escobar de Bright was charged on counts of conspiring to import heroin (Count…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. Tony Duckett v. Salvador Godinez Brian McKayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Arnold Sherlock and Ronald CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Stuart RommCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Donald Beardslee v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, of the California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. DohertyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API