Legal Opinion
United States v. Juan Ramon Matta-Ballesteros
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 15, 1995No. 91-50165UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
72 F.3d 136
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Juan Ramon MATTA-BALLESTEROS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 91-50165.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Jan. 4, 1993.
Submission Vacated April 7, 1994.
Resubmitted June 6, 1994.
Decided Dec. 15, 1995.
Before: BROWNING, POOLE, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.
1
MEMORAN…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. All Funds in Account Nos. 747.034/278, 747.009/278, & 747.714/278 Banco Espanol De CreditoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Sicherman v. Diamoncut, Inc. (In Re Sol Bergman Estate Jewelers, Inc.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1998