Legal Opinion

Franz v. Hair

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1930No. 4970PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFolland, J.

This action is to recover on a promissory note given by defendant to plaintiff. Judgment was entered for plaintiff on his motion for judgment on pleadings.

The complaint is in the usual form alleging execution and delivery of the note for $453.55, nonpayment of same, and balance due. The answer admits execution and delivery of the note and that it has not been paid, but sets forth by way of affirmative defense that the note was given as part payment on the purchase price of a truck; that thereafter the truck was redelivered by defendant to plaintiff and retained by plaintiff as his own…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Norman v. MeekerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. I. X. L. Stores Co. v. MoonUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Mitchell v. Berlin-McNitt Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. West Virginia MacK Sales Co. v. BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Bramwell Inv. Co. v. Uggla Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Notti v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Webb v. Chevy Chase Cars, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  5. Johnson v. SandersonMontana Supreme Court · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API