Legal Opinion
Hahn v. Hahn
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 5, 1954No. Civ. 19567PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
—Appeal bydefendant Sarah E. Hahn from a judgment decreeing foreclosure of a deed of trust and ordering a sale.
In 1946, Young Hahn, uncle of plaintiff, and defendant were living together as man and wife. They were not married because Young is a Korean by birth and defendant is a Caucasian. They lived together from 1937 until May 29, 1951, when they separated.
In August, 1946, Young and defendant contemplated purchasing a parcel of improved realty for $25,000. Young testified he discussed the purchase with defendant, and how the $25,000 might be raised, and told her, “We only have…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Prescott v. GradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Simpson v. BergmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Del Ruth v. Del RuthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Richard v. Degen & Brody, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Cirimele v. ShinazyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Coronet Credit Corp. v. West Thrift Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Kerr Land & Timber Co. v. EmmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Vaughn v. VaughnIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.