In Re Denice F.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Justice.
The mother of A and B appeals from a judgment of the District Court (Griffiths, J.) terminating her parental rights. She contends that the Department of Human Services [hereinafter “DHS”] did not establish beyond a reasonable doubt, as required by the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 1901-1963 (1983) [hereinafter “ICWA” or “Act”], that A and B are likely to suffer emotional or physical damage should they remain in her custody. She further asserts that DHS did not establish by clear and convincing evidence, as required by state law, that she is currently unwilling or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In re J.R.B.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re Annette P.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- State Tax Commission v. IversonUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- R.A.C.P. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
3Cited by15 opinions
- Valerie M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- Brown County v. Shannon R.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- In the Interest of W.D.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- In Re Trever I.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- In re Children of Shirley T.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.