Legal Opinion

Gamsey v. Building Inspector of Chatham

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 25, 1990No. 89-P-368PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

The plaintiff owns a resort motel in Chatham which he intends to convert to condominium units. 2 After the building inspector and town counsel informed him that § 5.97 3 of the zoning by-law of Chatham requires a special permit to effect such a conversion, the plaintiff, without applying for a special permit, brought this action under G. L. c. 240, § 14A, and under G. L. c. 231A seeking a declaration that the by-law provision was invalid. 4 *A judge of the Land Court held, contrary to the town’s contentions, that the plaintiff was not required to exhaust his administrative remedies before…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sturges v. Town of ChilmarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Green v. Board of Appeals of ProvincetownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. CHR General, Inc. v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Goldman v. Town of DennisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Green v. Board of Appeals of ProvincetownMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Needham Pastoral Counseling Center, Inc. v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  2. APT Asset Management, Inc. v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  3. Martin v. Building InspectorMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API