APT Asset Management, Inc. v. Board of Appeals
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.
This appeal brings before us the question of whether an “assisted living residence,” as defined by G. L. c. 19D, § 1, may be maintained in an “urban residence” district, *134“UR-D,” zoned for multifamily dwellings and apartment houses under the Melrose zoning ordinance. The issue came before the defendant board of appeals of Melrose (board) when the plaintiff APT Asset Management, Inc., applied for a special permit for accessory off-street parking in excess of four spaces to serve the proposed residence which it maintained was permitted as matter of right in a UR-D district. The board denied the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Framingham Clinic, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Board of Selectmen of Hatfield v. GarveyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Board of Appeals of WestwoodMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Foster v. Mayor of BeverlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Henry v. Board of Appeals of DunstableMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Britton v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Tanner v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Deadrick v. Zoning Board of Appeals of ChathamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
- Miles-Matthias v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
- Eastern Point, LLC v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.