Legal Opinion

Green v. Board of Appeals of Provincetown

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 14, 1988No. 87-568PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong , J.

The underlying issue in this case is whether, as ruled by a judge of the Superior Court, the defendant Wyman & Wyman of Provincetown, Inc. (W & W), is required by § 1260 of the Provincetown zoning by-law to have a special permit in order to operate a Burger King franchise in premises used until 1986 by a restaurant known as Cicero’s.3 Of broader concern, however, is a question of standing: whether the plaintiffs, who would lack standing to appeal if such a special permit were granted, have standing to insist that the special permit requirement be enforced. Since the adoption of the new Zoning…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Circle Lounge & Grille, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Pendergast v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  3. Leahy v. Inspector of BuildingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Pineo v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  5. Marotta v. Board of Appeals of RevereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Harvard Square Defense Fund, Inc. v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  2. Green v. Board of Appeals of ProvincetownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Shrewsbury Edgemere Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Tisbury Fuel Service, Inc. v. Martha's Vineyard CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  5. Warrington v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API