Green v. Board of Appeals of Provincetown
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong , J.
The underlying issue in this case is whether, as ruled by a judge of the Superior Court, the defendant Wyman & Wyman of Provincetown, Inc. (W & W), is required by § 1260 of the Provincetown zoning by-law to have a special permit in order to operate a Burger King franchise in premises used until 1986 by a restaurant known as Cicero’s.3 Of broader concern, however, is a question of standing: whether the plaintiffs, who would lack standing to appeal if such a special permit were granted, have standing to insist that the special permit requirement be enforced. Since the adoption of the new Zoning…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Circle Lounge & Grille, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Pendergast v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
- Leahy v. Inspector of BuildingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Pineo v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Marotta v. Board of Appeals of RevereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Harvard Square Defense Fund, Inc. v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Green v. Board of Appeals of ProvincetownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Shrewsbury Edgemere Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Tisbury Fuel Service, Inc. v. Martha's Vineyard CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Warrington v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.