Legal Opinion
Salcedo v. Toepp
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 25, 1998No. 71A03-9706-CV-189PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAILEY, Judge.
Case Summary
Appellant-Plaintiff, Michael A. Salcedo, D.P.M. (“Dr. Salcedo”), joined the established podiatry practice of Appellee-Defen-dant, Frank C. Toepp, D.P.M. (“Dr. Toepp”), in the late 1980s. On December 31, 1990, Dr. Salcedo contracted with Dr. Toepp to purchase his practice. The transaction was effected through four written contracts executed by Dr. Salcedo and Dr. Toepp. A fifth contract, a written Employment Agreement, was executed by Dr. Salcedo and Dr. Toepp’s wife, Appellee-Cross-Claimant, Rosemary W. Toepp, (“Mrs. Toepp”), for the purpose of continuing Mrs.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terre Haute Regional Hospital, Inc. v. El-IssaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hamlin v. StewardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Keith v. MendusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Prange v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- George S. May International Co. v. KingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Thomas K. Allen, Jr. v. Cedar Real Estate Group, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Art Country Squire, L.L.C. v. Inland Mortgage Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Turner v. Board of Aviation CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Chi Yun Ho v. FryeIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- D.S.I. v. Natare Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.