Osten v. Jerome
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Macomb. (Canfield, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are .stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment against the defendant for unlawfully flowing plaintiff’s lands.
The plaintiff owned and occupied 40 acres in the N. £ of the N. E. ¿ of section 31, and the W. £ of the W. -J-of the N. IV. £ of section 32, in the township of Warren, .Macomb county. Defendant and his brother owned land on section 6, in the township of Hamtramck, adjoining section 31 on the south, and the S. £ of the S. -\ of the S. W. £ of section 31, Warren.
" The plaintiff offered testimony tending to show that near to the dividing line of 31, in Warren, and section 6, in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gregory v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Laughlin v. Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Chapel v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by7 opinions
- Breen v. HydeMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Peacock v. StinchcombMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Pluchak v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Village of Trenton v. RuckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Miller v. ZahnMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.