Legal Opinion

Laughlin v. Street Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1886PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to superior court of Grand Eapids. (Parrish, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion and head-notes.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, O. J.

Plaintiff sued for personal injuries caused by the upsetting of a cutter while crossing defendant’s track, the cause of the accident alleged being the continued existence of a hard and slippery ridge left by defendant by the side of its track, and making the crossing-dangerous. The court below directed a- verdict for the-defendant on account of contributory negligence. Defendant now insists that, whether or not this defense is clearly made out, there is enough in the record to support the ruling, because no negligence appears in defendant, and because-the injury suffered by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Evans v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Bowen v. Detroit City Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cross v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Reichert v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Grandorf v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. McDonald v. Toledo Consol, St. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  5. Irion v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API