Legal Opinion
Bilby v. Wire
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 13, 1956No. 7582PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
The plaintiffs, H. F. 'Bilby and Maggie Mae Bilby, as joint' tenants, and Leroy Blaylock, seek to quiet title to all of Section 27, Township 143 North of Raríge 10Í West of the Sth P.M., in Billings County, North Dakota. The Bilbys, as joint tenants, •claim to be the owners of an undivided one-half interest in and to all of the oil, gas and other minerals, and Leroy Blay-lock, the owner of the other one-half interest therein, in and under the above described land. The complaint is in statutory form.
The defendants generally deny the allegations of the complaint and allege the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ohio Oil Co. v. Wyoming AgencyWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
- President, Managers & Co. of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Dixon v. KaufmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Frandson v. CaseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
- Grandin v. GardinerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Burlington Northern, Inc. v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State Bank of Towner v. HansenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Payne v. AM Fruh CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
- Stephenson v. StephensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Aure v. MacKoffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.