Legal Opinion

Beck v. Tucker

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1927No. 26090PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcG-owen, J.

On July 1, 1916, Beck, the appellant, hereinafter called the ‘ ‘ borrower, ” obtained a loan from Tucker, the appellee, hereinafter called the “lender,” amounting to three thousand dollars, and executed his several notes for the principal and interest at six per centum per annum as follows: An interest note for sixty dollars due November 1, 1916; five interest notes for one hundred eighty dollars each, due, respectively, November 1, 1917, 1918, 1919, 1920, and 1921; and one principal note for three thousand dollars, due November 1, 1921.

The interest notes due up to January 31, 1919, were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buntyn v. National Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Commercial Bank v. AuzeMississippi Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Kornegay v. Georgia State Building & Loan Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sunburst Bank v. KeithMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Eldridge v. Idaho State PenitentiaryIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Hardin v. Grenada BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. DorseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Chandlee v. TharpMississippi Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API