Interstate Life & Accident Insurance v. Williamson

Felton, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff in error does not argue the general grounds of the motion for a new trial and they are considered as abandoned. Therefore; we should consider only the special grounds and the overruling of the motion for a judgment n.o.v. as to damages and attorney’s fees. In this case a physician, whom the plaintiff consulted on July 13, 1960, testified that the plaintiff had told him at that time, in response to his question as to whether she had had any injury to her back, that she had injured her back about 4 months previously while bending over to pick up a shoe. Mrs.…