Legal Opinion

Travelers Insurance v. Sheppard

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 3, 1890PublishedCited by 199 opinions

Insurance. Evidence. Practice. Bonafides. Character. Bes gestee. Interrogatories. Eraud. Nonsuit. Witness. Trials. Damages. Before Judge G-ustin. Bibb superior court. November term, 1888. Action on a policy of accident insurance on the life of the plaintiff’s husband. The main defence was that he was not dead. The decision states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

The verdict against the company was for $5,000, the amount of the policy, together with over $1,000 for interest thereon, $750 for attorney’s fees, and fifteen per cent, on the aggregate for damages, the total finding being $7,575.27. The court refused to grant a new trial on any of the almost three score and ten grounds embraced in the motion.

The general grounds of 'the motion will not be discussed, save as to one of them, which will be considered briefly in concluding this opinion. The special grounds admit of classification thus: (A) Rulings on the admission of…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Travellers' Insurance v. McConkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Mitchum v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  3. Mallory v. . the Travelers' Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Tisdale v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  5. Piedmont, Etc. Life-Ins. Co. v. Ewing, Etc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by199 opinions

  1. People v. MarksNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  3. Joseph A. Puleio v. George A. Vose, Jr., Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  4. Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  5. Anderson v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899

194 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API