State v. Pollock
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
Defendant, who was convicted after a jury trial of six counts of first-degree sodomy, assigns error to the trial court’s admission of the victim’s out-of-court statements that defendant had sexually abused her. We conclude that the trial court did not err and affirm.
In the summer of 2007, defendant was living with his then-girlfriend. He stayed home during the day with his daughter and stepdaughter, and also babysat the neighbor’s three-year-old daughter, the victim in this case.
The victim and her mother moved to a different neighborhood in August 2007 and did not socialize with defendant or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bell v. Preferred Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- State v. MechlingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. MacKOregon Supreme Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Demetrice De'angelo TompkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- State v. HudspethCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- People v. MirandaColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. Zamora-ChonaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- Amended April 27, 2015 State of Iowa v. Demetrice De'angelo TompkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.