Legal Opinion

State v. Pollock

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 22, 2012No. 200908796; A143631PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendant, who was convicted after a jury trial of six counts of first-degree sodomy, assigns error to the trial court’s admission of the victim’s out-of-court statements that defendant had sexually abused her. We conclude that the trial court did not err and affirm.

In the summer of 2007, defendant was living with his then-girlfriend. He stayed home during the day with his daughter and stepdaughter, and also babysat the neighbor’s three-year-old daughter, the victim in this case.

The victim and her mother moved to a different neighborhood in August 2007 and did not socialize with defendant or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Bell v. Preferred Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. State v. MechlingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. MacKOregon Supreme Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Demetrice De'angelo TompkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. State v. HudspethCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. People v. MirandaColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. Zamora-ChonaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. Amended April 27, 2015 State of Iowa v. Demetrice De'angelo TompkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API