Legal Opinion

State v. Hudspeth

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 20, 2018No. A159941 (Control); A159943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.

*478In two criminal cases, defendant was convicted of multiple sex offenses committed against his 15-year-old ward, J.1 In a consolidated appeal from the resulting judgments, defendant assigns error to the trial court's denial of his motion to exclude out-of-court statements made by his wife, Glenda Hudspeth, to police officers, a grand jury, and a social-service provider. In those statements, Glenda said that defendant had admitted to sexually abusing J. Defendant argues that the trial court's admission of the statements violated the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. State v. HaugenOregon Supreme Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. KiniCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. ZamoraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API