State v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.
The trial court committed appellant to the custody of the Mental Health Division after finding that, because of a mental disorder, she was a danger to others and was unable to provide for her basic personal needs and was not receiving the care necessary for her health or safety. ORS 426.005(l)(d)(A), (B). Appellant argues that the state did not carry its burden for involuntary commitment. On de novo review, State v. Cunningham, 190 Or App 202, 204, 78 P3d 125 (2003), we reverse.
We review the facts as they existed on the date of the commitment hearing. State v. North, 189 Or App 518, 520, 76…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. BuntingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Matter of LucasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. AyalaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. NorthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. D. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. S. R. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. M. A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. M. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. A. M.-M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.