People v. Madden
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mullarkey
I. Introduction
In this case, we consider Louis Madden’s convictions for attempted third degree sexual assault and attempted patronizing of a prostituted child. On appeal, Madden claimed that he was deprived of his constitutional right to know the nature and cause of the charges against him due to a difference between the charging document and the jury instructions in the description of third degree *454sexual assault. Madden also argued that he could not be convicted of attempted patronizing a prostituted child because there was no evidence that the victim received or that Madden gave anything of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- State v. NietoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Kogan v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Frazier v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- United States v. RichterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- People v. PahlColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. WeinreichSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- People v. HouserColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- People v. ManzoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.