Legal Opinion

Davidow v. Bank of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1931No. Docket No. 113, Calendar No. 35,425PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

The defendant reviews by writ of error a judgment entered against it for $959.44. The pertinent facts appear from the following portion of the circuit judge’s findings:

“On January 30, 1926, J. and A. Schweizer executed to Davidow & Davidow their promissory note in the amount of $900 in payment of legal services. This note was indorsed by Davidow & Davidow and came into the possession of the Bank of Detroit. April 1, 1926, it was paid by the receipt of $50 in cash on principal and the accrued interest and by the giving of a new note for $858. June 2d, this renewal note was paid by the payment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. In re State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  3. Detroit Piston Ring Co. v. Wayne County & Home Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Balbach v. FrelinghuysenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1883
  5. Fayette National Bank v. SummersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Andrew v. Security Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  2. Tustin Elevator & Lumber Co. v. RynoMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Squire, Supt. v. GoulderOhio Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API