Legal Opinion

Tustin Elevator & Lumber Co. v. Ryno

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1964No. Calendar 85, Docket 50,345PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

This is an action brought by Howard J. Smith, a lumber dealer doing business as Tustin Elevator & Lumber Company, against Gerald Ryno and wife for materials furnished for the construction of a cottage. Plaintiff also sued Clyde Waite, a contractor and carpenter who built the cottage, and the Lake County State Bank in which bank funds were supposedly deposited to plaintiff’s account. Upon motion of the Rynos the matter was transferred to the chancery side of the court in order that there might be a full determination of the rights and liabilities of all of the parties in a single proceeding. A…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Schmid v. Village of FrankfortMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Davidow v. Bank of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Iwanowa v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
  2. Warren Tool Co. v. StephensonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Clements v. JungertIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Spartan Asphalt Paving Co. v. Grand Ledge Mobile Home ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Atlas Concrete Pipe, Inc. v. Roger J. Au & Son, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API