Legal Opinion

Ingersoll v. DeBartolo, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1994No. 60968-3PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

Plaintiff wife, Marjorie Ingersoll (Plaintiff), slipped and fell while walking in the common area of The Tacoma Mall. The Mall is owned by defendant DeBartolo, Inc., d.b.a. The Tacoma Mall. Defendant American Building Maintenance Company-West, Inc. (ABM) had contracted to perform janitorial services for The Tacoma Mall (Mall). Plaintiff and her husband, Maurice Ingersoll, who sued for loss of consortium, brought suit against the Defendants, alleging their failure to maintain a safe common area. The trial court granted summary judgment to both Defendants. We affirm.

Preliminarily, we note…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Pimentel v. Roundup CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Ciminski v. Finn Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. Wiltse v. Albertson's Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Smith v. Manning's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Iwai v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Iwai v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Fisher v. Big Y Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. Schmidt v. CooganWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Schmidt v. CooganWashington Supreme Court · 2007

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API