Legal Opinion

Trusty v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1940No. S. F. 16386Published

1Opinion of the Court

16 Cal.2d 550 (1940)

JOSEPH M. TRUSTY, Petitioner,

v.

THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

S. F. No. 16386.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

November 12, 1940.

J. B. Zimbars and H. J. Kleefisch for Petitioner.

Claude Minard for Respondent.

THE COURT.

Petitioner seeks herein to review the action of the board of governors of the State Bar in a disciplinary proceeding instituted against him before local administrative committee No. 5 for the city and county of San Francisco. In the order to show cause issued and served upon him petitioner was charged with the violation of his oath and duties as…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In re CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Marsh v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. In Re CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Marsh v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Lantz v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API