Legal Opinion
Feldmeier v. Watson
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 2005No. CV-05-0325-AP/ELPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RYAN, Justice.
¶ 1 The Superior Court of Yavapai County enjoined the placement of an initiative measure on a ballot because the court found that the petition circulators’ affidavits did not substantially comply with the verification requirements of Article 4, Part 1, Section 1(9), of the Arizona Constitution, and Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 19-112(C) (2002). Having concluded that the affidavits complied with the legal requirements, we previously ordered that the trial court’s ruling enjoining the placement of the initiative measure on the ballot be vacated, with an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Renck v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Whitman v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1942
- Western Devcor, Inc. v. City of ScottsdaleArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Direct Sellers Association v. McBrayerArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Bullard v. OsbornArizona Supreme Court · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Forszt v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- McGee v. Secretary of StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Las Vegas Convention & Visitors Authority v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Fidelity National Title Co. v. Town of MaranaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Parker, Springer Jr., Anderson v. Committee for Sustainable Retirement in Support of InitiativeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.