Legal Opinion

Bivens v. Rednour

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 7, 2011No. 10-1363PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Illinois prisoner Aryules Bivens was convicted of escaping from jail. He petitioned the district court for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, claiming that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance. The district court denied his petition. Because Bivens’ claim is proeedurally defaulted and lacks merit, we affirm.

In 1984 Bivens was serving a life sentence for murder and armed robbery and awaiting trial on another armed robbery charge when he and five other inmates— Brian Daniels, Raymond Greer, Gregory Hill, Jerry Mahaffey, and Reginald Mahaffey — attempted to escape…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Harris v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. DANIELS v. WARDENDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020
  2. DOYLE v. STATE OF INDIANADistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021
  3. Howard v. WardenDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2025
  4. Martin-Andrade v. BenzelDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2025
  5. Mata v. BrannonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API