Legal Opinion
Scott v. Potter Electric Signal Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 18, 2010No. ED 93554PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NANNETTE A. BAKER, Judge.
Introduction
Bernard Scott (“Appellant”) appeals pro se from an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which affirmed a decision of the Division of Employment Security Appeals Tribunal denying employment compensation benefits. Appellant’s brief fails to comply with the rules of appellate procedure so substantially that we cannot review this appeal, and therefore it is dismissed. 1
Discussion
Pro se. appellants are held to the same standards as attorneys regarding the mandatory appellate briefing rules of Rule 84.04. 2 See Pointer v. State, Dept. of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lueker v. Missouri Western State UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Carden v. Missouri Intergovernmental Risk Management Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Thornton v. City of KirkwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Pointer v. State, Department of Social ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Schaefer v. AltmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Nichols v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Hamilton v. ArcherMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Lattimer v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- City of Lee's Summit v. CookMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Hubbard v. Schaefer Autobody Ctrs., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.