Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Archer
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 20, 2018No. ED 105342PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAngela T. Quigless, J.
Adam Lee Hamilton ("Mr. Hamilton") appeals pro se from the circuit court's judgment following a trial de novo on his small claims petition against George M. Archer ("Mr. Archer"). The circuit court entered judgment in favor of Mr. Archer. Mr. Hamilton's brief fails to comply with the rules of appellate procedure so substantially that we cannot review this appeal, and we therefore dismiss it.
Discussion
Pro se appellants are held to the same standards as attorneys regarding the mandatory appellate briefing requirements of Rule 84.04.1 Scott v. Potter Elec. Signal Co. , 310 S.W.3d 311, 312 (Mo.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Washington v. BlackburnMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Fritz v. FritzMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Lueker v. Missouri Western State UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Johnson v. Buffalo Lodging AssociatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Waller v. ShippeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Dr. Patt McGuire v. Jerry Edwards, Scott Briete, St. Louis County, State of Missouri, Office of the State Court Administrator, and Genevieve FrankMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Midtown Home Improvements, Inc. v. Antoinette TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- A.C.C. v. S.B.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Marjorie Richardson v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- A.C.C. v. S.B.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2019
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.