Legal Opinion

Pointer v. State, Department of Social Services

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 2008No. ED 90301PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner, Charles Pointer, appeals pro se from a judgment of the trial court affirming the decision of the Director of the Family Support Division of the Department of Social Services denying his application for energy assistance benefits. Because petitioner’s brief is insufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of this court, we dismiss this appeal.

We hold pro se appellants to the same standards as attorneys. Smith v. City of St. Louis Civil Service Com’n, 216 S.W.3d 698, 699 (Mo.App.2007); Kramer v. Parkret Restaurant, Inc., 226 S.W.3d 867, 869 (Mo.App.2007); McGill v. Boeing Co., 235 S.W.3d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Park-Et Restaurant, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. McGill v. Boeing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Tate v. Department of Social ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Smith v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSIONMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carlisle v. Rainbow Connection, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Johnson v. Buffalo Lodging AssociatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Scott v. Potter Electric Signal Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Wong v. WongMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Duncan v. DuncanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API