Bailey v. Prime Western Spelter Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Allen district court.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,:
The controlling evidence in this case was given by witnesses who demonstrated the facts by using a model of the machine by which the decedent was killed. Here is a typical question and answer:
•• “Ques. You say he put his hand in just the way you are doing it there? Ans. Right in this way [indicating] under that spout, and when he tripped it appeared like his hand turned over that way [indicating] .”. The model is not before this court, and if it were the demonstrations could not be reproduced here. Consequently the general and special findings of the jury will not be disturbed as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Caspar v. LewinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Brinkmeier v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Western Furniture & Manufacturing Co. v. BloomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cheek v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Tom Reed Gold Mines Co. v. MorrisonArizona Supreme Court · 1924
- Rambo v. Empire District Electric Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Ginochio v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Weeks v. Seymour Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.