Legal Opinion

Brinkmeier v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1904No. 13,765PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error from Sedgwick district court; D. M. Dale, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bukch, J. :

While serving the defendant in the capacity of brakeman the plaintiff was injured in an attempt to couple freight-cars. In an action for the recovery of damages a demurrer to his evidence was sustained, and the railroad company justifies the conduct of the trial court upon three grounds ; (1) That it had no notice of the defect in the appliance causing the injury; (2) that the hazard was one incident to plaintiff’s employment, and therefore assumed; (3). that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence.

The defective appliance was a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Greenleaf v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. BancordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. Finnerty v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  4. Alexander v. President of Mt. SterlingIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Carrier v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1900

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. George v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. McCabe & Steen Construction Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  3. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. v. LoosleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. Brady v. Kansas City, St. Louis & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. Schoof v. ByrdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API