Brinkmeier v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Sedgwick district court; D. M. Dale, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Bukch, J. :
While serving the defendant in the capacity of brakeman the plaintiff was injured in an attempt to couple freight-cars. In an action for the recovery of damages a demurrer to his evidence was sustained, and the railroad company justifies the conduct of the trial court upon three grounds ; (1) That it had no notice of the defect in the appliance causing the injury; (2) that the hazard was one incident to plaintiff’s employment, and therefore assumed; (3). that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence.
The defective appliance was a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Greenleaf v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. BancordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Finnerty v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Alexander v. President of Mt. SterlingIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Carrier v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1900
3Cited by19 opinions
- George v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- McCabe & Steen Construction Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. v. LoosleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Brady v. Kansas City, St. Louis & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Schoof v. ByrdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.