Legal Opinion
Tom Reed Gold Mines Co. v. Morrison
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided April 12, 1924No. Civil No. 2130PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, C. J.
— The plaintiff, Ernest B. Morrison, brought an action under the Employers’ Liability Law (Civ. Code 1913, pars. 3153-3162) against the Tom Reed Gold Mines Company to recover damages for personal injuries. From a judgment in his favor for the sum of $15,000, entered upon the verdict of a jury, and a denial of its motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.
At the time of the injury Morrison was operating what is known as a left-hand, cut-off saw which swung to and from the timber to be cut, and ran by electric power. It was suspended in a frame to which was fastened a handle and a weight; with…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mithen v. JefferyIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Manigold v. Black River Traction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Arnold v. California Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Putnam v. Pacific Monthly Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Southwest Cotton Co. v. RyanArizona Supreme Court · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ray v. Tucson Medical CenterArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Di Pietruntonio v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- Scott v. ScottArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Consolidated Motors, Inc. v. KetchamArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Evans v. MasonArizona Supreme Court · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.